A Little Professionalism Advice for Newly Certificated Flight Instructors (CFIs)

Ok, so you are a new CFI. Ready to take on the world, teach all comers to defy gravity, and be a pilot like you. It’s pretty cool.

But along with this comes a level of professionalism that you should bring to job. It comes with any job, but in many cases, there is little that separates a CFI from a student other than a couple of checkrides, a little flight experience, and some study.

The reality for many CFIs is that they are of the same age, or just slightly ahead of many of their students in their career aspirations and, in some cases, living in the same places as their students. This is especially true in many academy-style training environments or collegiate training operations where students are rapidly turned into CFIs and end up working with their recently former fellow student compatriots. For many CFIs, this is their first actual job. It takes effort to get good at this or any job.

Completing your CFI certificate is a big accomplishment. A step along the path of being a professional aviator. And it isn’t just about being a professional pilot. It is something different, and it is about being a teacher, a mentor, and a guide for others. It comes with different responsibilities than just flying a plane from place to place.

But it is also just a first step. It is part of a learning process and of professional development that starts and never truly ends. It is an important phase of not only your own aviation career but also of others with whom you work.

The CFI ACS specifically addresses a testing task, “Elements of Effective Teaching in a Professional Environment,” which has sub knowledge, skill, and risk management items on the professionalism topic.

  • FI.I.E.K3Flight instructor qualifications and professionalism;
  • FI.I.E.R2 – Exhibiting professionalism; and
  • FI.I.E.S1 – Deliver ground or flight instruction on an evaluator-assigned Task in a manner consistent with instructor responsibilities and professional characteristics as stated in K1 through K5.

While you may have been tested on this a little bit in your practical test for the CFI certificate, the real test is when you start actually instructing. The real world test of these items is where it becomes reality.

Let’s talk about a few pieces of advice that relate to these items that perhaps didn’t get a deep dive of coverage in your training or testing to become a CFI. Let’s talk it a little deeper and make it a little more personal.

Embrace Continuous Learning

As a CFI, your role extends beyond just imparting knowledge to your students. It is crucial to remain a lifelong learner yourself. Stay up-to-date with changes in aviation regulations, technological advancements, and emerging best practices. Keep learning by attending seminars and workshops, many of which are available online for free. This will enhance your skills and knowledge. Seek out educational content, even if it’s just 10-15 minutes of videos on YouTube a couple of times a week. Engage with experienced CFIs, network within the aviation community, and seek mentorship opportunities to further develop your teaching techniques. Continuous learning will improve your instructional abilities and ensure that you provide your students with accurate and relevant information.

Cultivate Effective Communication

Strong communication skills are paramount for CFIs. Be clear, concise, and organized in your instructions. Adapt your teaching style to accommodate each student’s learning preferences and abilities. Encourage open dialogue, actively listen to your students, and provide constructive feedback. Effective communication creates a positive and conducive learning environment, allowing students to ask questions, seek clarification, and voice their concerns. Additionally, develop a professional rapport with your students by fostering trust, respect, and empathy. Building a strong student-instructor relationship enhances the learning experience and encourages student engagement and motivation.

Doing all of this means more than just going flying. Be a communicator. That is teaching.

Prioritize Safety

Safety is the foundation of aviation, and as a CFI, it is your responsibility to instill a safety-oriented mindset in your students. What you start them with will take them through their entire pilot pathway. Emphasize the importance of adhering to standard operating procedures and pre-flight planning, and don’t compromise on aircraft safety. Encourage risk management and decision-making skills, teaching students to recognize and mitigate potential hazards. Lead by example and demonstrate a commitment to safety in all aspects of your instruction.

Tailor Instruction to Individual Needs

Every student is unique, with varying strengths, weaknesses, and learning styles. Tailor your instruction to cater to individual needs, adapting your teaching methods and techniques accordingly. Identify students’ strengths and build upon them while addressing areas requiring improvement. Set realistic and achievable goals, providing them with the necessary guidance and resources to succeed. Remember that learning to fly can be challenging sometimes, and your role as a CFI is to provide guidance, motivation, and mentorship throughout the process.

Develop Organizational and Time Management Skills

Being a CFI entails managing multiple responsibilities, including scheduling lessons, preparing lesson plans, evaluating student progress, and maintaining accurate records. Develop strong organizational and time management skills to ensure smooth and efficient operations. Use calendars, checklists, and digital resources to stay organized and effectively manage your workload. Prioritize tasks, allocate sufficient time for lesson preparation, and maintain accurate and up-to-date student records. Too few CFIs really excel at this, and their students’ training records demonstrate this fact. Too often, students are left at checkride day needing more information to be documented so their test can proceed. Get in the habit of delivering good record keeping as the training is given to best serve your students.

Don’t Get Overly Personal with Your Students

Frequently, CFIs are of very close age to their students. Many times a CFI finds themselves completing their certification and instructing people of their own peer group, potentially even friends.

But the CFI needs to honestly think about how they behave around their students and what their reputation is as a professional.

I am not saying you need to no longer be friends with people you were before, but you need to be an example of professional aviation. Some things need separation.

While there will always be exceptions, generally, the following represents some really good advice tips:

    • Don’t date your students.
    • Don’t drink with your students.
    • Don’t drink with your fellow employees.

Working as a CFI is a job. Not a party. This isn’t a high school clique.

If you do any of these, you run the risk of extra drama invading your work. If you go out partying, and people will know it, make sure there is ZERO question that you have left sufficient time between that activity and when you will fly again. You can’t afford to be the CFI that people saw at a party or the bar at 2 am, and now they are flying that 8 am flight. They may wonder about your professional decision-making choices.

When I owned a business years ago, an old friend gave me sage advice. He said, “Don’t drink in the town where you have a business.” The rumor mill will spread and undermine you. 

Sure, there are exceptions to all of these rules. You can find examples of life-long couples who met in a student/CFI relationship. There are certainly people who I have provided training to whom I now count as one of my ‘drinking buddies’ and, in some cases, first met because they sought me out for some instruction. But all of those things are exceptions, and I ensure that if those activities occur, they are well separated from any flying activities. With those exceptions, I can tell you I have seen hundreds of examples that went bad compared to the few that ended up good. If you are going to ignore these three tips, do it very carefully and understand the risks.

Being a CFI isn’t just about your knowledge and skills as a pilot. It is also about your professional conduct. If you take this part of the job as seriously as the rest, you will be seen as a professional. Isn’t that something a good CFI would want to be?

5 Ways Centralized Pilot Examiner Software Can Save Time and Reduce Checkride Backlog

by Adam Shimmens

PilExOS, A Modern Solution to Improving Examiner Operations and Reducing Checkride Wait Times.

Designated Pilot Examiners (DPE), are vital to ensuring pilots are being trained to meet FAA standards and have the  abilities to safely execute a flight as a licensed pilot. Their operational efficiency directly impacts the rate at which applicants can train. If applicants are needing to wait for weeks or even months to get a Checkride, then this slows their training, which ultimately leads to higher costs and career delays, creating a ripple effect across all operators involved. One key strategy that can significantly enhance efficiency and streamline operations is adopting a centralized scheduling approach within the DPE community. PilExOS was purpose built to tackle these issues and many more.

1 | Better Manage Applicant Volume

With the proper geographical safeguards, calendar blocks, and permissions in place, software serves to protect an Examiner’s time and create less manual work tracking high volumes of inbound communications from Applicants and schools.The efficiency gains for each Examiner within a centralized system ensures broader market gains from Applicants and Schools.

2 | Enable Self-Service

A centralized software solution simplifies the process for applicants, instructors, and flight schools to find available Examiners within a geographic region. Within a web portal, applicants and schools can easily view available Examiners, where they’re located, checkride costs, what information and documents are required, and then complete their booking without ever having to talk to an Examiner. This streamlines communication and reduces the time to book a Checkride. Examiners gain hours of time back each month by letting automation handle their Administrative tasks.

3 | Enhanced Communication

Effective communication is crucial for Examiners to ensure the Applicant has met the necessary requirements to accept the Checkride. A Centralized system facilitates seamless communication and coordination by consolidating all necessary information and documentation in one place. Automated notifications for any exam changes keep everyone informed and aligned, especially given the likelihood of weather related delays requiring date and/or location changes. Auto-reminders also help reduce last minute cancellations.

4 | Better Applicant Experience

When technology and automation run seamlessly, the administrative burden is reduced. This enhances transparency and frees up Examiners and Applicants time to better focus on more important tasks, like preparing for the actual Checkride. With the integration of ACS codes lookup, all parties involved can quickly ensure any missed codes from the written exam are added to both the booking and the Examiners Plan of Action.

5 | Eliminates Double-Bookings

Centralized systems, with the proper safeguards in place, prevent applicants from booking more than one Examiner at a time per exam type, which drastically reduces the wasted opportunities for unsuspecting Examiners, and reduces Checkride backlog.

Learn more at https://pilexos.com/

GAJSC Fly Safe Flyer Winter 2025 Edition

The General Aviation Joint Safety Committee (GAJSC) Winter 2025 Newsletter is now out for your educational indulgence!

The winter 2025 edition covers topics in articles including:

  • General Aviation Safety Performance Update
  • Recent Fly Safe Topics Cover Vestibular Illusions, Overreliance on Automation, Flight Data
  • Monitoring, and Safety Culture
  • New Rotorcraft Collective Video Covers the Pitfalls of PED Use
  • New Online Aviation Meteorology Reference Now Available
  • Safety Enhancement Spotlight — Safety Culture

A quarterly publication, the GAJSC Fly Safe Flyer is crafted to talk about to+pics relating to pertinent and timely safety concerns in the national airspace system.

You can view, or sign up to get the newsletter sent to you quarterly at

https://www.gajsc.org/newsletter/

 

Pilot training experience requirements… Just do what the regulation says!

The title of this blog post sounds a little, well, bitchy. In a way, it is meant to sound that way to draw attention and to make the point that we have something to fix.

In too many training processes, we have CFIs and their students trying to get creative with their training. They are trying to shortcut training, combine requirements, and double-dip things to make it so there is less time needed to get things done. Many times this is causing students to end up with missing or mis-qualifying activities toward their required aeronautical experience.

Please stop trying to get overly creative!

That’s it. Don’t get creative and try and mix and match.

The best advice I can give here is simple: “Do what the regulation says.”

Let’s give you some examples of where this goes awry.

How about this as a long private pilot solo qualifying cross-country flight?

 

At first look, it might look good. It has more than 150 NM, it has a leg that is longer than 50 NM and a landing point that was more than 50 NM from the original point of origin (14 CFR 61.1 definition). But there is a hiccup here.

The crafty, creative CFI thought it would be a great opportunity for the student to get in some practice at another airport, in this case had the student grab another airport, a 4th one, along the way. They thought that the student doing another landing at Marion (KMWA) would be some good additional experience for them at a towered airport.

They aren’t wrong about that, but in a strict sense, it now means that cross-country solo flight doesn’t count toward the experience requirements for a private pilot certificate.

Huh? You are probably reading this and thinking, “Why?”

Well, words matter. Let’s break it down.

14 CFR 61.106 (a) (5) (iii) indicates that a private pilot candidate needs to complete:

It doesn’t say “at least 3 landings” or “3 or more landings”, it says AT 3. By doing 4 airports in this case (inclusive of the one the student came home to, they didn’t do what the regulation says.

Ok, this is picky. Yup, but it is technical and correct.

That savvy CFI might just then say, Ok, well, then how about I have him “fix his logbook” and that the last leg home was a “different flight” then?

Hmm. Maybe. But how did they endorse the student for that then? Does that match what the student did? or logged?

Plus, this will cause another problem.

If we indulge this possibility, we get the following.

Ha!, see, now its only 3 airports! Yup. But now its less than 150 NM total distance. So, by making that “creative logging” change, you kill the cross country as a qualifying item another way.

Build this carefully, and just do what the regulation says and you won’t end up in this challenge.

What about instrument cross-country requirements?

We have that long IFR cross-country we have to do. Here is an example of one.

Well, it gets the 250 NM, if we assume they shot approaches at airports they could and did the right mix of those along they way, it looks good on the surface.

The regulation (14 CFR 61.65) says the instrument pilot in training must complete the following:

Here are a few ways this could go wrong, and did.

First, the student and CFI didn’t land at KTVC or KSLH but did land at KRQB where they got fuel before coming back to their home airport at 7D3 (which didn’t have fuel). So, while the total distance traveled is over 250 NM, they didn’t land at a location that is over than 50 NM away from the point of origin. KRQB back to 7D3 was only 17.3 NM. This means that the ENTIRE flight doesn’t count as a cross-country flight for use toward a certificate/rating according to the definition in 14 CFR 61.1.

Ok, so that’s a problem. But let’s assume they had landed at KTVC of KSLH, even a full stop taxi-back and then on their way they went. Well, the regulation states that the pilot must have “an instrument approach at EACH airport.”

In this case, the CFI and the pilot flew three approaches, one at KTVC, one at KSLH, and one at KRQB, and then just jumped back to 7D3 VFR, not shooting an approach. I noticed this when I saw 4 airports, and 3 approaches. It got me asking more questions and that’s what I found. That also would nullify meeting the requirement.

Ok, let’s say that they logged that flight separately, the quick VFR leg back home. I think you might see where this is going from the example above, but without that extra 17.3 NM they end up with a total flight distance of 247 miles; short of the required 250. Sigh. A little better planning ahead of this particular event could have avoided these pitfalls.

I have seen this instrument long cross-country flight go wrong lots of ways. Flying out of an airport that doesn’t have an approach and returning to it. Not flying enough total miles, but getting the number of approaches. Failing to land at somewhere more than 50 NM away. All of these can nullify a very expensive flight from counting toward the required experience.

There are LOTS of hiccups in the commercial pilot training experience requirements in 14 CFR 61.129 that people get creative with.

My favorites are when people try to “double dip” a cross-country requirement from their private or instrument training toward their commercial. These are separate regulations. Just because your CFI was with you on a cross-country flight in your instrument rating doesn’t mean that you can use it also toward your dual day or night cross-country experience requirements for your commercial. There are some creative ways to plan ahead, do a fly out somewhere meeting a requirement and back meeting another one, but that takes good planning and some forethought and savvy. Most people mess this up if they to do it ad hoc. If you are planning a full training sequence from student pilot to commercial pilot for a customer you may be able to do this if you lay it out correctly.

If not, again, my best advice is to do what the regulation says in one separate activity to ensure it meets the requirements.

The biggest problem in the commercial we end up finding relates to the solo time requirements. 14 CFR 61.129 (a) (4) [single-engine] and (b) (4) [multi-engine] note that the pilot shall complete:

So let’s imagine we wanted to go away from the cold weather in the winter with our plane and do some flight training in Puerto Rico. Sounds good, right?

How about this for a long-commercial-qualifying cross-country flight?

Scenic, beautiful, a total of 315 miles.

Ha, you may be thinking, the regulation says they have to land at 3 places! They landed more than that it kills it, right?!

Well, not in this case. The commercial specifically says “with landings at A MINIMUM OF three points…”This means you can land as many times as you want during this effort. But it does say you have to have a landing point that is more than 250 NM from the point of origin.

Again, language counts.

In this case, KTJBQ (Aguadilla) to the furthest point away, TISX (St. Croix) is only 141 NM. So, you haven’t traveled somewhere physically far enough away from where you started.

We commonly see this messed up for this reason, when people think there has to be a “leg” that is over 250 NM of “in-air” time (that isn’t the case for this one) or even that people think you have to return from the flight! You could go somewhere 251 NM away, fly 50 NM back, park the plane, and never bring it back. I have seen people meet this requirement when they were selling a plane, delivering it, etc. But they did so carefully in their logbooks.

The commercial requirements have to be carefully applied.

Again, you are probably tired of hearing it by now, just do what the regulation says.

There are some more on the commercial and the private that you might want to check out in an older blog post of mine, “Common CFI Checkride “Administrata” Errors” posted in February of 2019. These errors haven’t gone away since I posted this. They keep happening, but we can improve.

How about a couple of others?

In the private pilot, there must be landings at night:

I have seen CFIs do these at “touch and go” landings. That doesn’t count.

The same holds for the requirements for a student in private pilot training at controlled airports practice where they have to complete:

I have watched tower controllers clear students for “the touch and go” and the student either wasn’t instructed to make them full stop landings or was afraid to ask the controller to do so when the controller cleared them otherwise. These little things count.

I could keep offering more of these, but I think you get the point. Get detailed, simplify it, and do what the regulation says. Don’t try to get too crafty. It can burn your student if you don’t get it exactly correct when you try to wedge too many experience requirement satisfying things in one activity.

So, how can you make sure you don’t make these mistakes?

Have a good checklist for each certificate/rating you are training someone for (or if you are receiving training; you can take some control of your training efforts to make sure your CFI is doing it right). There are lots of them out there, there are even some under the Resources tab on this website you can use. I don’t care if you use mine or someone else’s but use something. Don’t just “wing it” (pun intended) and hope that toward the end you can go back into the FARs and review if you have managed to cover everything.

Have a good syllabus, not just things you will cover, but an order in which you will do it. I get it, you might get bored going to the same airports with students over and over, but if you build a sequence that works, covers everything you are supposed to cover, and meets the requirements, it will make sure your students get it done right. Plus it isn’t about you as a CFI. You are supposed to be a professional providing a good training experience. And for them, it will be the first time they have done these things. Think about proper customer service and professional instruction efforts.

Track the student’s progress through the experience requirements, syllabus, and training program. Document it well in case another CFI has to step in and do any of it, or if you as a CFI have to move on to other jobs. Don’t leave your student in a case where people don’t know what experience requirements are done and what ones are left to cover.

When it comes down to it, it is about being a professional. Be a competent CFI who puts the time into planning your student’s training effort to be effective, and efficient, and that it will meet requirements properly.