Planning for CFI Transition as Airline Hiring Ramps Up

By many indications, the airline industry is setting up for another wave of robust hiring in 2025 and 2026. This has an effect on the flight training community, in that many of the CFIs that flight training providers will be hired and move from flight instruction positions to professional pilot positions at airlines or other jobs. Flight training providers are familiar with how these exodus of certified flight instructors (CFIs) times affect their employee base. With major U.S. airlines expecting to hire over 1,800 pilots in the first half of the year alone, the ripple effects will be felt at the grassroots level of aviation education. Many CFIs who are currently working have already accumulated the 1,500 flight hours (or less for restricted-ATP qualified candidates) required for their Airline Transport Pilot (ATP) certificate and will move quickly to higher-paying roles at regional airlines. This turnover can disrupt the continuity of training programs if they aren’t prepared for it.

As training businesses grapple with this instructor drain, strategic planning becomes essential to backfill or even pre-fill positions while preserving institutional knowledge and training standards. There are actionable strategies flight training providers can leverage to mitigate disruptions to their CFI staffing solutions

The last year has seen reduced hiring by many airlines, do not expect this to continue into 2025, 2026, and beyond. It may not be the same fevered hiring that happened in 2022 and 2023 especially, but it will be measured and active. According to CAE’s 2025 Aviation Talent Forecast, the industry will require 1.465 million new professionals over the next decade to accommodate fleet expansions and retirements. Boeing’s long-term outlook projects a need for 674,000 new pilots globally over the next 20 years. In the U.S., while hiring has normalized from the post-COVID surge, projections indicate over 10,000 vacancies in 2025, driven by retirements and increasing air travel demand. A couple of major airlines have already started hiring for large classes in the end of 2025 and are moving toward active hiring in 2026. This will trickle down to regional airlines, who will hire actively from our industry’s CFI pool. This environment lures CFIs away, as regional airlines offer competitive salaries—often much higher than instructor pay—and benefits like signing bonuses and improved schedules.

For training providers, the implications are profound. A sudden loss of experienced instructors can lead to scheduling bottlenecks, increased student wait times, and potential revenue dips. Moreover, maintaining consistency in training is critical to student success and safety. Without proactive measures, providers risk losing their competitive edge in a market where students demand efficient, tech-integrated training.

Expect turnover of CFIs.

In one analysis of data from CFI’s resumes on Zippia showed that many CFIs do not stay in their positions very long. In the analysis, it showed the following:

Length of CFI Time in Job
————————-
<1 year      23%
1-2 years    37%
3-4 years    13%
5-7 years    13%
8-10 years   4%
11+ years    10%

This shows 60% of CFIs have tenures under 2 years, underscoring the rapid turnover cycle. Continue reading

Teaching the Importance of Knowing How to Use the Aircraft’s Audio Panel

I sat there on the practical test while the applicant fumbled, trying to figure out why “the radios didn’t work.”

Sigh.

It was pretty obvious to me, but it certainly wasn’t to them. To some degree, it was their fault. But it was also certainly the fault of the training they had received that had never introduced to them how to use a simple yet critical component of the avionics package in their aircraft.

The audio panel.

Most general aviation aircraft are equipped with an audio control panel that allows pilots to manage communication and navigation radios. Audio panels commonly include the following functions:

  • Power: The ability to turn the power on or off to the audio panel. Frequently co-functionally located with the volume control. Turned all the way down and past a “click” will commonly mean off for the entire system.
  • Volume: The ability to control radio volume for what the pilot and/or passenger and crew will hear
  • Communications Selector – The ability to switch audio in and transmission between communications radios (if equipped with multiple; most planes have two)
  • Navigation audio selector: Used to monitor radio frequencies to identify frequencies or potentially hear the transmission of weather information or ATC communications over remote frequency outlets.
  • Intercom controls: Frequently offering isolation of pilot and crew from passenger audio, volume, squelch control, etc.
  • Marker beacon controls:  For instrument approaches these allow a pilot to toggle audio identification of marker beacon audio on or off
  • Music, Bluetooth or auxiliary audio inputs: These are more common in modern panels for additional functionality such as input of music or other input devices.

As flight instructors, we emphasize critical aspects of flying: aerodynamics, navigation, emergency procedures, and radio communication. However, one often overlooked component of cockpit management is the aircraft’s audio panel. Proper use of the audio panel ensures clear communication with Air Traffic Control (ATC), other aircraft, and passengers. A pilot who does not understand how to operate this system efficiently can experience confusion, missed instructions, and potentially hazardous situations. Teaching students to master the audio panel early in their training builds confidence and enhances flight safety.

Frequently when I am doing practical tests I find applicants don’t know how to fully, or even partially use these systems. They are used to the settings being pre-set-up for them, never changing, or just leave it on one or two things because they don’t know how to change the configurations or what they mean.

It can be critically helpful to fully understand these systems to properly conduct flight operations.

When I find an instrument student who doesn’t know how to get audio on a navigation radio, it is a pretty clear indication that they have no idea how to identify a VOR or localizer frequency.

If a student has no idea how to monitor audio on a second com radio, potentially even making sure that the radio is at a lower volume than their primary selected radio, it is an indication that they will have to leave an assigned frequency to listen to weather reports or if they wanted to contact Unicom, flight service, or any other frequency while still monitoring an assigned frequency. Hopefully, if they did that, they would at least be smart enough to let ATC know they were leaving for a moment and would be back, but frequently I find they don’t, and it means they might miss communications in the interim.

The ability to handle music input from a corded input or a Bluetooth connection is an obvious challenge if it becomes a distraction. One might argue that these such connections should not be used during critical phases of flight, or during training operations, but frequently they are and pilots don’t know how to silence or minimize them through their audio panel.

Marker beacons seem to be more of a mystery in general any more than a lack of just understanding how to handle the audio. Many pilots with whom I have flown have no idea why there are even blinking lights for the “O”, “M”, and “I”, let alone that if they unmute the audio for the marker beacon that they will correspond to overflying one of these markers. Even more confusing for many pilots seems to be that “darn beeping sound” sometimes as I get near airports. This happens when someone has unmuted the marker function and they have no idea what this is or how to mute it again.

I could probably go on, but I think you see the challenges we have here as instructors are forgetting to focus on the audio panel as a part of their avionics training efforts.

Each aircraft may have slightly different models and each may have some specific operational knowledge needed, but the general functions are the same across most of the common models. If we teach these, they will be more understandable to our students and improve safety.

Why Audio Panel Proficiency is Crucial

Ensuring Clear Communication with ATC – ATC instructions are essential for safe navigation, especially in controlled airspace. A pilot who does not correctly manage the audio panel may transmit on the wrong frequency, fail to hear ATC instructions, or inadvertently block transmissions. Teaching students to verify and actively manage their selected frequencies prevents confusion and ensures compliance with ATC directives. It can also be important for a pilot to be able to mute their passengers at critical times to limit distractions.

Improving Situational Awareness – Sometimes pilots need to monitor multiple radio frequencies, including ATC, weather advisories, and local traffic. Proper use of the audio panel allows them to isolate specific frequencies or listen to multiple channels simultaneously. This skill is particularly useful during busy operations such as approaching controlled airports or navigating high-traffic airspace.

Managing Cockpit Workload – An overloaded cockpit can lead to mistakes. If students struggle to use the audio panel, they may spend excessive time adjusting controls rather than focusing on flying the aircraft. Teaching students efficient audio panel use—such as quick frequency switching and intercom management—reduces their cognitive load, allowing them to focus on more critical tasks.

Enhancing Communication in Multi-Crew Operations – In more advanced flight training and professional aviation careers, pilots must communicate effectively in multi-crew environments. The ability to manage intercom settings, isolate communications, and prioritize critical transmissions fosters clear and professional cockpit communication.

Ensuring Passenger and Crew Comfort – For flight instructors and commercial pilots, the audio panel is a key tool for managing passenger communication. A well-trained pilot can quickly adjust intercom settings to ensure clear communication without unnecessary distractions.

How to Teach Audio Panel Proficiency

Ground Training and Explanation

Before students interact with the audio panel in flight, provide a detailed ground lesson covering:

  • The purpose and function of each control.
  • The difference between COM1 and COM2 usage.
  • How to monitor navigation frequencies
  • How to properly set up and verify frequencies before flight.
  • The role of the intercom system and how to adjust volume settings.
  • Troubleshooting common audio issues.

Use a cockpit poster, training simulator, or sitting in the aircraft without it running can allow a CFI and their student to familiarize themselves with the unit. Obviously, supplemental manuals for the audio panel should be shared with the student. Encourage students to verbalize their actions, reinforcing their understanding.

Pre-Flight Checks and Setup

Integrate audio panel management into the pre-flight checklist. Before starting the engine, students should:

  • Verify the correct communication and navigation frequencies.
  • Test the intercom and passenger headset settings.
  • Check audio panel power and volume settings.
  • Ensure active frequency selection aligns with their intended communication needs.

Encouraging these habits early fosters a routine that carries into their solo and advanced training.

In-Flight Practice Scenarios

During flight lessons, create real-world scenarios that require students to manage the audio panel effectively. Examples include:

  • Switching between COM1 and COM2 when transitioning from ATIS to ground control.
  • Adjusting intercom settings to reduce background noise in a high-workload environment.
  • Simulating an audio failure and teaching troubleshooting techniques.
  • Monitoring multiple frequencies, such as listening to a CTAF while receiving weather advisories.
  • Having your student contact flight service on a second radio (this will also show them how to do this in general!)
  • Isolating crew communications in simulated emergencies.

Emergency Audio Panel Training

Audio panel malfunctions are rare but possible. Teach students emergency troubleshooting, including:

  • Switching to an alternate COM radio.
  • Identifying if the headset, push-to-talk button, or panel is malfunctioning.
  • Using a backup hand microphone with the system if their headset or transmit buttons are not functioning

The aircraft audio panel is an essential yet often underemphasized component of cockpit management. By systematically teaching its functions, importance, and real-world applications, flight instructors prepare students for effective and safe communication in all flight environments. A pilot proficient in audio panel management not only enhances their own safety but also contributes to a more structured and efficient airspace. Make audio panel training a priority to ensure your students develop strong communication habits that will serve them throughout their aviation careers.

Oh, I almost forgot to tell you about how the practical test applicant managed after his initial troubles.

There was nothing wrong with the aircraft communications radios. The problem was simple, the previous pilot had actually turned the audio panel off for some reason.

Having never been taught anything about the audio panel beyond volume and switching between com 1 and com 2, the pilot had no idea you could even turn it off. It had just always worked for him before.

His response after a couple of minutes of trying to figure it out was to say, “Well, I think it has to be broken and we will need to call maintenance to fix it.”

Sigh. Again.

I asked, “Are you sure?”

He paused, confused, and obviously not sure.

This was a practical test, something during which you are supposed to be familiar with your aircraft’s systems and operations.

After a slightly awkward pause I said, “If it is a legitimate maintenance issue, I understand the need to call maintenance. However, if it is a pilot performance problem, due to lack of proficiency and I can solve it instead that is a demonstration of lack of meeting the ACS standards for knowledge of systems in the aircraft.”

He paused some more. And decided to try a little bit more, “playing with buttons and knobs” we will call it.

A little stroke of luck happened and he happened to push in the volume knob instead of just turning it, which happened to turn the audio panel on and bring it to life. His relief was obvious.

We proceeded from there into the rest of the test. Which, unfortunately, ended up unsuccessful. Honestly, it wasn’t as much because I don’t think he had the ability to do the rest of the flight properly, but because by that time he was so rattled that he got himself behind the rest of the task demonstrations. He was so rattled from that start that it finally caught up in misprogramming other actions in the gps system on the first approach we set up. 

It all stemmed from the beginning of the activity when lack of systems knowledge started the path to failure moving. If this had been a flight in normal operations, not a practical test, I don’t know how it would have gone. He might have just called maintenance and they would have come down and fixed it, by turning it on for him, and he would have felt embarrassed. It might also have been the catalyst of a failure to manage systems in a real-world situation that resulted in worse outcomes. These things may sound like small things to address as a CFI, the audio panel, but they integrate into the rest of the operations our students conduct. Failing to properly do one thing can be the first step down the path to an unsuccessful flight operation. Give your students the skills to avoid taking that first step in the wrong direction, on a checkride, or in a real-world flight operation.

Why Pairing Low-Time Instructors with Low-Time Pilots Adds Risk to Training and How to Mitigate the Risk

In a system where flight training providers bear immense responsibility for ensuring safety, Certified Flight Instructors (CFIs) are a critical component of the system, guiding aspiring pilots through the complexities of flying. The common practice in many flight schools—pairing newly minted, low-time CFIs with beginner students—can inadvertently heighten risks. Low-time instructors, often fresh out of their own training with just 250-300 total flight hours, may lack the nuanced judgment needed to handle novices who are themselves grappling with basic controls. 

The critical nature of flight training means that CFIs must sometimes make split-second decisions. The CFI’s decision can turn a botched maneuver into a safe recovery or turn an unsafe landing into a go-around or a safe landing. Experience can be a critical factor in a CFI’s ability to see a bad situation developing. 

An argument can be made that to mitigate these dangers, flight schools could strategically pair newer CFIs with more experienced students, such as those pursuing commercial pilot certificates or flying with students who have already soloed and are doing cross-country experience, night experience, or preparing for a practical test. This allows CFIs to build expertise in a lower-risk environment before transitioning to initial, or primary, students. 

The Inherent Risks of Pairing Inexperienced Instructors with Novice Students

Flight training is inherently risky, as evidenced by general aviation (GA) safety statistics. Instructional flights, which make up a significant portion of GA activity, are not immune. In fact, accidents during flight instruction often stem from a combination of human factors, with pilot error accounting for about 69% of all GA mishaps. When both the instructor and student are low-time—meaning the CFI has limited hours beyond certification and the student is at the private pilot stage or earlier—these risks amplify.

Low-time CFIs typically enter the field after accumulating the minimum required hours: 250 for a commercial certificate and additional time for the CFI rating. They are proficient pilots but often inexperienced teachers. Teaching beginners requires not just flying skills but also the ability to anticipate errors, manage stress, and intervene swiftly in emergencies. Novice students, with zero to 40 hours of experience, are prone to basic mistakes, such as improper fuel checks, neglecting weight and balance calculations, or misjudging density altitude—oversights that can lead to catastrophic outcomes. A low-time CFI might not yet have the “at-the-ready” instincts to catch these in time, especially if they’re still refining their own risk assessment abilities.

Another layer of risk arises from the psychological dynamics. New CFIs might hesitate to assert authority or overcorrect, fearing they appear inexperienced. Inexperienced students can become overwhelmed, which can lead to panic in critical moments. Pairing two novices essentially doubles the learning curve, creating a feedback loop where errors go uncorrected longer, potentially escalating minor issues into emergencies. Research shows that accident rates for pilots rise early in their careers before declining with accumulated experience, a pattern that applies to instructors as well. 

The Advantages of Starting New CFIs with Advanced Students

To counter these risks, flight schools might choose to prioritize assigning newer CFIs to students at more advanced stages, such as those training for commercial pilot certificates. Commercial students already hold private pilot certificates and have 100-200 hours of flight experience, making them more capable of handling the aircraft independently and less likely to deviate significantly from safe flight conditions. This setup allows the CFI to focus on instructional techniques rather than constant vigilance over basic flight control.

Advanced students are less likely to make rudimentary errors that could endanger the flight, giving the new CFI a buffer to develop teaching skills. Starting fresh CFIs with certificated pilots—such as those undergoing flight reviews or pursuing advanced training might be a good idea because those pilots already have developed base skills and poficiencies For instance, commercial training involves complex maneuvers like chandelles, lazy eights, and multi-engine operations, which require the CFI to demonstrate expertise but in a context where the student can contribute meaningfully to risk management.

Building experience this way also boosts the CFI’s confidence and competence. Lessons learned from early hours as a new instructor include adapting to individual student needs and refining communication skills honed more effectively with cooperative, experienced learners. Advanced students can provide constructive feedback, helping the CFI identify blind spots without the pressure of managing a complete novice. This phased entry reduces the instructor’s own error rate, as they accumulate hours in a supportive environment. Furthermore, it mitigates burnout; teaching beginners demands constant energy for motivation and correction, whereas advanced sessions allow for deeper discussions on topics like aviation regulations and decision-making.

From a school perspective, this strategy improves overall training quality. By reserving seasoned CFIs for primary students—who need that “at-the-ready” expertise—resources are allocated efficiently. It also addresses the unintended consequences of rushed instructor progression, such as high turnover, which can disrupt student continuity and elevate risks. In essence, starting with commercial students acts as a mentorship-by-proxy, where the student’s prior knowledge supports the instructor’s growth.

Transitioning to Primary Students: A Structured Path to Reduce Risk

Once a new CFI has gained sufficient experience—say, 200-500 dual-given hours with advanced learners—flight schools could facilitate a smooth transition to working with initial students. This isn’t an abrupt shift but a deliberate process involving evaluation, mentoring, and ongoing oversight.

Criteria for transition might include demonstrated proficiency in risk management, as outlined in FAA handbooks on teaching practical risk mitigation during instruction. Schools can implement checkpoints, such as simulated lessons with chief instructors or peer reviews, to ensure readiness. Mentoring programs pair transitioning CFIs with veterans for co-teaching sessions, allowing real-time guidance on handling beginners’ unique challenges, like overcoming fears or mastering basic maneuvers.

This graduated approach directly reduces risk. While advanced training paradoxically carries higher accident rates due to complex maneuvers (greater than primary instruction in some analyses), the overall instructional fatality risk remains lower than non-instructional flights. By ensuring CFIs enter primary training with honed skills, schools minimize the amplification of risks when inexperience meets novelty. Scenario-based training, emphasized by the FAA, can be integrated here to teach both instructors and students how to manage real-world hazards.

Broader Implications for Aviation Safety

Adopting this model contributes to broader improvements in GA safety. With accident rates influenced heavily by experience levels—rising early and falling as hours accumulate—structured instructor development can break the cycle of early-career mishaps. It also aligns with industry efforts to reduce fatalities through better training paradigms. Ultimately, safer training produces better pilots, lowering the percentage of accidents attributed to pilot error across aviation.

If you are a flight training provider, perhaps consider giving this a try if you aren’t already doing so. This might be a strategic shift in how a flight training provider assigns their CFIs students. It might mean pairing newly certificated CFIs with commercial students and transitioning methodically to beginners to create a new path to risk mitigation. By adopting this phased approach, training providers can enhance safety, potentially reduce accident and incident rates, and foster better-prepared pilots and instructors alike.

FAA Notice Indicates FAA Chart Users Guide Will NOT be Discontinued

The FAA had previoulsy indicated it was going to discontinue the FAA Chart Users Guide, but in a FAA Notice issued on August 13, 2025 the FAA noted that it would not discontinue the guide now, but that:

“The FAA will continue to publish the Aeronautical Chart Users Guide. However, beginning August 7, 2025, updates will no longer follow the regular 56-day charting schedule. Instead, revisions will be made on an as-needed basis to reflect changes or corrections.”

You can find this notice at:

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/safety_alerts/media/VIS_25-05_CN_CUG_Chart_Publication_Schedule.pdf

You can get the most current version of the FAA Charts User’s Guide at:

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/flight_info/aeronav/digital_products/aero_guide/