Think Turtle. Don’t Go Octopus.

In a slightly modified version of the age-old aviation “ABC – Airspeed, Best field, Checklist” mantra for what to do in emergencies in an aircraft, I have three general rules of flying that I personally fly by and teach my students.

1. Maintain control of the aircraft.

2. Use control of the aircraft to not hit stuff.

3. Do everything else after these have been accomplished.

It’s simple, but the first rule makes sure you are in control, still have “flying speed” (haven’t ended up in a stall-spin), and can make decisions on what to do with that control.

The second is where that control kicks in. Use it to not hit stuff. Other planes, the ground, airspace, clouds, trees, etc. Put the plane somewhere safe where you have time to do other stuff next.

Which is rule three. If you have successfully done rules 1 and 2, you can do the rest of the things. Checklists, diversions, whatever you need to make your flight as safe as possible.

But I now add two more rules into the mix. I stole some of this from a friend in the boating industry who teaches people to drive their boats, adapted and modified it for the aviation training and proficiency sector.

Rule 4: Think Turtle.

Rule 5: Don’t Go Octopus.

Ok, let me explain.

If you have followed rules 1, 2, and 3, start doing things methodically and slowly if needed, to make sure you don’t miss things.

You now have time to make decisions on the actions you will take next. Don’t just grab stuff. Make conscious choices.

Think Turtle means don’t rush what you are doing, even in an emergency. But it is especially true for setting up maneuvers, planning for landings, or programming flight routes into navigation systems.

Just because you want, or need, to do something doesn’t mean it has to be done at the fastest possible pace. That leads to incorrect inputs.

Most of the old captains will tell you the old joke, “What’s the first thing to do in an emergency in an airliner?” The answer to the question is, “Take a drink of coffee.”

It exemplifies the need to take your time and not rush your reaction. That will allow you to fully evaluate what is actually happening and plan an appropriate response.

Don’t Go Octopus means make your actions purposeful. Don’t just start grabbing levers or pushing buttons without thinking about what doing that is going to do. If you don’t know what something is going to do, figure it out first instead of just grabbing stuff or hoping.

I stole this, as I alluded to above, from a friend in the boating instruction realm. Many boats have two throttles, two gear levers, and a steering wheel.

As humans, we have two hands. And we can’t grab all those things at once.

But people try. They just start grabbing levers and the wheel and get the boats going all kinds of ways they probably don’t want to. Especially when trying to dock. Even worse if it is windy.

We have lots more levers and buttons in our flight decks than most boats, and the lesson applies here also. Think about what you want to do, engage that lever or button, and generate the outcome you need to happen. Don’t just start grabbing and moving a bunch of stuff at once.

This may all sound kind of silly, but the point here is to be methodical and systematic in our flight operations. Especially in emergency scenarios.

Yes, there are memory items and rote responses we need for some things, but as we do those, and then proceed into emergency, or just maneuvers, checklists and procedures, doing so methodically and systematically ensures we don’t miss things or have incorrect inputs that make situations worse, or fail to improve the situation in emergencies.

Something as simple as rushing through a checklist, or trying to do it from memory, might let a pilot miss a fuel tank switch from an auxiliary tank to a main tank after the auxiliary tank has gone empty, causing an engine power loss when the main tank was still full of fuel. I use that specific example because it happened to someone I did a checkride for later on in their flight career. It was a completely avoidable accident, a forced landing in a field.

I have actually begun putting little stuffed turtles on the dash of some of my students to remind them to slow down during training and proficiency practice. It is a visual reminder for them when they start to feel the “rush” to get something done in training or testing.

There are times when just taking that breath, slowing ourselves down, and doing things like a turtle and not going octopus in our flight decks is just what we need to ensure a better outcome or performance.

FAA MOSAIC Final Rule Designee Briefing and Fact Sheet Documents

The FAA has recently provided a briefing and a MOSAIC fact sheet for Designees who may be working with applicants for sport pilot certificates or who may be exercising sport pilot privileges.

These documents include information that may additionally be of interest to applicants, pilots who are or are exercising sport pilot privileges, or CFIs who are working with students or pilots who are pursuing sport pilot training.

These documents help provide clarification of some questions that may arise in relation to recent regulatory changes related to the MOSAIC process.

Click here for the FAA MOSAIC Fact Sheet

Click here for the MOSAIC Final Rule Designee Briefing

Indications from the 2025 FAA Knowledge Test Data

It is the time of the year when data from last year’s pilot certification efforts starts to come out, and I start to play with spreadsheets and see what that data is showing us for the past year, and compare it with years past.

The FAA recently posted the knowledge test statistics from 2025, a partial indicator of what certification efforts were doing in the year. Precursors to being able to finish certificates, the FAA knowledge tests are partial gauges of the volume of certification efforts going on in the United States.

So, with that said, let’s see what some of those data points showed last year and compare them with recent years.

ATP Knowledge Test Numbers Up Slightly from the Previous Year

While ATP certificate issuances actually dropped in 2025 (click here for my post on this topic and to see the numbers from 2025 – ATP Certification Numbers Dip in 2025), knowledge test volume did not follow suit.

You can see from the chart that ATP testing numbers went up slightly. This might be an indicator that there continues to be a large number of pilots preparing to complete ATP certificates in the upcoming years.

The next chart is an aggregated chart showing tests for multiple individual tests, from private pilot to CFI tests.

 

Instrument, Commercial, and CFI Tests Increase

Not surprisingly to me, the test volumes in instrument ratings, commercial pilot, and CFI testing continued to grow again in 2025. Each of these tests saw increases in volumes compared to the past years, and compared to many of the previous years. As we have continued to grow the lower-level certification efforts, and as those pilots continue to push through career pilot-focused training paths, they continue to take more knowledge tests. A large push of training has been happening since approximately 2020, and those pilots continue to flow through our training sector and become CFIs, where they then gain experience to meet ATP pilot experience requirements.

Private Pilot Test Decrease

For the first year since 2020, we saw a decrease in the number of Private Pilot knowledge tests given. It wasn’t overly large, down just a couple of thousand tests from the previous year, and still well above the testing volume of much of the past two decades, but it wasn’t a continued increase. I can’t tell you what that means, if it is a temporary burble, or if it is the beginning of a trend, but it will be worth watching.

Sport Pilot Testing Numbers Flat

We continue to see very flat numbers of sport pilot knowledge tests year-over-year. However, with the implementation of the changes from the MOSAIC regulatory efforts, it will be interesting to see if this number does increase in 2026 or subsequent years. This will be a metric my own curiosity will have me looking to again next year.

Overall Test Numbers Up.

When we look at the total volume of FAA knowledge tests, it continues to grow.

But there is a factor here that has been a big part of it over the more recent years, the large volume of tests for unmanned aircraft.

When we look at a chart that does not include these, but just includes the historical battery of available tests, the increase in volume isn’t quite as drastic, but still showing growth.

The table below lets you see that unmanned aircraft systems knowledge tests, since they began in 2016, have accounted for a relatively significant number of the overall test volume. They now represent well over 30% of the FAA knowledge tests given in a year.

The Numbers Behind the Graphs

The table below is the aggregated data from which these charts were made, and shows much more detailed, specific data points you can dig into.

 

Clarification of Additional Rating(s) Tables in the Commercial ACS Appendix 1

The FAA has recently sent to DPEs a “Clarification of Additional Rating(s) Tables in the Commercial ACS Appendix 1” document that helps provide guidance on the requirements for maneuvers on practical tests. While this clarification is helpful for DPEs, it is also important for instructors and applicants for additional commercial ratings to understand the requirements.

Click here to see the clarification document.